-
Added Galaxy S9+ (Exynos 9810) to the list. 669 realtics with stock governor & settings.
Mate 20X normal settings -> 792
Mate 20X performance settings -> 591
Wow, the Kirin 980 is a beast. ?
Pocophone F1 stock settings: 627
Thanks, added! Good to see Snapdragons have improved so much, great result.
Pocophone F1
Update: Installed miui 10 v8.11.23 beta (android 9).
Stock settings: 568 realtics
Honor Play – Kirin 970 on Android 8.1 – 843 (831 with Game Acceleration enabled)
Thanks, added! Good to see so many phones are performing so well. ??
Getting an average of 775 after Pie update on Nokia 8 (sd 835). On oreo it was 847.
Thanks, I’ve updated the list.
I would like to see the Snapdragon 855 in the list..
Yeah, SD 855, Exynos 9820, Kirin 980. All three should deliver amazing performance:
https://infogram.com/samsung-galaxy-s10-exynos-vs-snapdragon-1h1749qynywq2zj
Edit: just saw the Kirin is already in the list, and falls a bit short. Most likely due to cpu management, it’s slowing the Exynos 9810 down as well. I managed to squeeze a mindblowing 424 realtics score out of my S9+, but you need root, and a lot of tweaking for that.
Wow, what changes did you made? And What SoC version S9+ do you have? I could check on my wifes S9+ (Exynos)..
Galaxy Note 8 (N9500) (Qualcomm 835)
normal mode (interactive governor) = ~1000
performance mode (performance governor) = ~800
I have just checked with my Note 8 (N9500) and Android 8 i get better results, the old report was with Android 7.1.1
those are new results
Galaxy Note 8 (N9500) (Qualcomm 835) (Android 8)
normal mode (interactive governor) = ~850
performance mode (performance governor) = ~720
I will get Android 9 in a few weeks and will redo those bench and see if it improve again…
I have tested on my wifes Galaxy S9+ (G965F) (Exynos 9810)(Android 9) and get only
normal mode (interactive governor) ~800
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
MagicDosbox (C) 2014 – 2024